Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

The Hall-Jorgenson Model of Investment

Authors
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University
Econ-ARK
Johns Hopkins University
Econ-ARK

Hall & Jorgenson (1967) consider the problem of a firm that produces output using capital k\kap as its only input,

y=f(k)\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \inc & = \fFunc(\kap) \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

and which obtains its capital k\kap from a market in which a unit of capital can be rented for a unit of time at rate ϰt\kapRent_{t}.

In period tt, the firm maximizes profit (implicitly normalizing the price of output to 1),

maxkt ktαϰtkt\max_{\kap_{t}} ~ \kap_{t}^{\kapShare}-\kapRent_{t}\kap_{t}

yielding first order conditions

f(kt)=ϰtαktα1=ϰt(yt/kt)α=ϰtkt=(yt/ϰt)α.\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \fFunc^{\prime}(k_{t}) & = \kapRent_{t} \\ \kapShare \kap_{t}^{\kapShare-1} & = \kapRent_{t} \\ (\inc_{t}/\kap_{t}) \kapShare & = \kapRent_{t} \\ \kap_{t} & = (\inc_{t}/\kapRent_{t})\kapShare . \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

This equation says the level of capital is always instantly adjusted to yt\inc_{t} and ϰt\kapRent_{t}, with no costs of adjustment.

What determines the cost of capital? In the simple case with no taxes and no capital market frictions of any kind, an investor must be indifferent between putting his money in the bank and earning interest at rate r\rfree, and buying a unit of capital, renting it out at rate ϰt\kapRent_{t}, and then reselling it the next period.

The purchase price at which capital goods can be bought at date tt (distinct from the rental rate, and typically much larger) is:

Ptpurchase price of one unit of capital,\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \Price_{t} & - & \text{purchase price of one unit of capital}, \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

and in continuous time, the rate of change of Pt\Price_{t} is P˙t\dot{\Price}_{t}. Assume that capital depreciates geometrically at rate δ\depr. The net profit from the continuous time purchase-and-rent strategy is

ϰtδPt+P˙tIncome from renting, minus loss from depreciationplus capital gain from the change in price of capital.\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \kapRent_{t}-\depr \Price_{t}+\dot{\Price}_{t} & - & \text{Income from renting, minus loss from depreciation} \\ & \text{plus capital gain from the change in price of capital}. \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

Thus, the no-arbitrage condition is

rPt=ϰtδPt+P˙t(r+δ)Pt=ϰt+P˙t.\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \rfree \Price_{t} & = \kapRent_{t} - \depr \Price_{t} + \dot{\Price}_{t} \\ (\rfree+\depr) \Price_{t} & = \kapRent_{t}+\dot{\Price}_{t} . \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

where the left-hand side is the return from putting money in the bank at rate r\rfree, which we assume is perfectly certain and time-invariant.

Now to simplify our lives we will assume constant capital goods prices, P˙t=0\dot{\Price}_{t}=0. Thus, substituting the value for ϰt\kapRent_{t} from (6) into (3) we have:

kt=αyt/ϰt=αyt/(r+δ)Pt.\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \kap_{t} & = \kapShare \inc_{t}/\kapRent_{t} \\ & = \kapShare \inc_{t}/(\rfree+\depr)\Price_{t}. \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

Now let’s introduce taxes, defined as follows:

τcorporate tax rate (0.34 in US) ζinvestment tax credit (sometimes 10 percent, sometimes 0) \begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \taxCorp & - & \text{corporate tax rate ($\approx 0.34$ in US) } \\ \itc & - & \text{investment tax credit (sometimes 10 percent, sometimes 0) } \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

The net, discounted, after-tax price of capital to the firm is[1]

P^t=(1ζ)Pt.\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \hat{\Price}_{t} & = (1-\itc) \Price_{t}. \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

Now let’s rewrite the arbitrage equation (6) taking account of taxes. The rental income ϰt\kapRent_{t} must be multiplied by (1τ)(1-\taxCorp) because the capital-rental business must pay taxes too:

(r+δ)P^t=(1τ)ϰt+P^˙t.\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} (\rfree+\depr) \hat{\Price}_{t} & = (1-\taxCorp) \kapRent_{t}+\dot{\hat{\Price}}_{t}. \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

If we simplify again by assuming that P^˙t=0\dot{\hat{\Price}}_{t}=0, we have

ϰt=(r+δ)Pt(1ζ)/(1τ).\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \kapRent_{t} & = (\rfree+\depr)\Price_{t}(1-\itc)/(1-\taxCorp) . \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

Note that so far we have not derived a formula for investment - we have derived a formula for the level of the capital stock. But net investment is just the difference between the capital stock in periods tt and t1t-1. Thus, the Hall-Jorgenson model of gross investment is

it1=ktkt1+δkt1=(Δytϰt)α+δkt1\begin{gathered}\begin{aligned} \inv_{t-1} & = \kap_{t}-\kap_{t-1}+\depr \kap_{t-1} \\ & = \left(\Delta \frac{\inc_{t}}{\kapRent_{t}}\right)\kapShare+\depr \kap_{t-1} \end{aligned}\end{gathered}

(where we neglect some minor complications having to do with the distinction between continuous and discrete time).

Footnotes
  1. Assume that if the firm sells the capital, it must repay the ITC on a pro-rata basis; this prevents tax arbitrage opportunities.

References
  1. Hall, R. E., & Jorgenson, D. (1967). Tax Policy and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review, 57.